Make lxml requirement less restrictive #642
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Since lxml version 5.2.0, lxml.html.clean (required by newspaper) got extracted into a separate library. Using the [html_clean] extra allows for lxml versions >= 5.2.0 (for older versions the extra will be ignored).
murtazajafferji
approved these changes
Dec 9, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since lxml version 5.2.0, lxml.html.clean (required by newspaper) got extracted into a separate library. Using the [html_clean] extra allows for lxml versions >= 5.2.0 (for older versions the extra will be ignored).
Proposed Changes:
Remove upper bound for lxml by adding the [html_clean] extra. This way, newer versions of lxml can be used together with newspaper4k.